Estimate the number of true null hypotheses among a set of p-values
Source:R/tree-functions.R
zeta.Rd
An upper bound on the number of true null hypotheses in the region associated to
the \(p\)-values pval
is computed with confidence 1 - lambda
.
The functions described here can be used as the method
argument
of zetas.tree()
.
Usage
zeta.HB(pval, lambda, ...)
zeta.kBonf(pval, lambda, k = 1, ...)
zeta.trivial(pval, lambda, ...)
zeta.DKWM(pval, lambda, ...)
Value
The number of true nulls is over-estimated as follows:
zeta.DKWM
Inversion of the Dvoretzky-Kiefer-Wolfowitz-Massart inequality (related to the Storey estimator of the proportion of true nulls) with parameter
lambda
zeta.HB
Number of conserved hypotheses by the Holm-Bonferroni procedure with parameter
lambda
zeta.kBonf
Number of conserved hypotheses by the \(k\)-Bonferroni procedure with parameter
lambda
, plus \(k-1\)zeta.trivial
The size of the p-value set which is the trivial upper bound (
lambda
is not used)
Details
The \(k\)-Bonferroni procedure controls the \(k\)-Familywise Error Rate (FWER) at the desired level, hence the number of conserved hypotheses, plus \(k-1\), is a suitable upper bound (because up to \(k-1\) rejected hypotheses are also true nulls). For \(k=1\) (the default), it is the regular Bonferroni procedure. The Holm-Bonferroni procedure controls the FWER, hence the number of conserved hypotheses is a suitable upper bound.
References
Durand, G., Blanchard, G., Neuvial, P., & Roquain, E. (2020). Post hoc false positive control for structured hypotheses. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 47(4), 1114-1148.
Dvoretzky, A., Kiefer, J., and Wolfowitz, J. (1956). Asymptotic minimax character of the sample distribution function and of the classical multinomial estimator. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, pages 642-669.
Holm, S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6 (1979), pp. 65-70.
Massart, P. (1990). The tight constant in the Dvoretzky-Kiefer-Wolfowitz inequality. The Annals of Probability, pages 1269-1283.
Storey, J. D. (2002). A direct approach to false discovery rates. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 64(3):479-498.
Durand G. (2025). A fast algorithm to compute a curve of confidence upper bounds for the False Discovery Proportion using a reference family with a forest structure. arXiv:2502.03849.